Diagrammen talar sina tydliga språk. Testet som omfattande totalt 891st mätningar, visade att 10 konkurrentprodukter hade försvunnit från ytan redan efter en tvättcykel. Två produkter var borta efter två tvättcykler och en stod emot åtta cykler. Men efter 14 tvättcykler i slitagemaskinen, fanns både vår FormulaU™ Car Paint Protection och FormulaU™ Marine Gelcoat Protection fortfarande kvar på respektive yta. Vi är övertygade om att de överlägsna egenskaperna hos FormulaU™ är ett resultat av våra egna ständiga och ingående tester, samt studier av fysiken bakom hydrofobiska ytor och vidhäftning.

Den unika kunskapen utnyttjar vi för att hjälpa våra kunder att skydda och underhålla sina fordon och båtar. Vi vet att vi har en bra produkt, men blev ändå förvånade över hur stor skillnaden är mellan FormulaU™ som vi utvecklat och tillverkar själva och de produkter som presterade sämst i testet.

Date: 2016-11-22

Reference: 3P07507

A comparison of 15 different chemical sealants for surface protection. 3 separate tests were performed. The tests conducted were:

• Measuring of contact angle and abrasion with cleansing products – report 3P07507
• Chemical wear resistance – report 3907507-1
• UV-blocking properties – report 3P07507-2

13 products were tested on painted steel panels, and 2 products were tested on gelcoated fiberglass panels. The abrasion with car/marine cleansing products and subsequent contact angle measurements, distinguishes itself to 3 products; Mr CAP FormulaU™ Car Paint Protection and Mr CAP FormulaU™ Marine Gelcoat Protection applied on both painted steel panels and fiberglass panels with a result of 14 washing cycles, and PPS Paint Sealant that had a durability of 9 washing cycles. All other products reached a durability between 1 and 3 washing cycles.

A washing cycle consists of 20 back and forth movements in abrasion tester. This corresponds to 13 standard manual car washes.

The chemical wear resistance was tested with two harsh chemicals, sulphuric acid (H₂SO₄) and sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and was afterwards ocularly examined, pertaining to gloss and colour change. All the products managed sulphuric acid without any negative impact. However, the test with NaOH showed 7 products with no negative impact, 5 products with moderate loss in gloss, and no change in colour and 3 products with distinct loss in gloss and colour change.

The UV-blocking properties are not providing major differences between the tested products. There are none or very little UV-blocking additive in all the tested products.

There are a vast number of waxes and other type of car/marine surface protection products on the market intended for car paints and gelcoated fiberglass. Some products are available for the professional industry only, while others are retail grade products. Applied on the paint/fiberglass, the manufacturers of those products claim that the products generate a long-term durable protective, glossy and easy-to-clean surface. The durability is stated in marketing material and/or on the product package in terms of years. However, the durability of the products varies and is affected by the product content and external wear such as cleansing products, wash sponges and similar cleaning accessories. It is therefore accurate to measure the durability in terms of washing cycles in order to be able to quantify the durability in terms of time. 15 internationally well-known products were tested in a simulated manual car wash cycle in combination with contact angle measurements between each washing cycle in order to determine the durability of each product. Contact angle measurements were utilized to determine how many washing cycles each product was able to withstand. This procedure was repeated until there was no protective product left on the car paint or the gelcoat panel.

At that point the contact angle value had returned to the reference contact angle value. The number of washing cycles for each product that could be performed  before the contact angle value had returned to the reference contact angle value determined the durability of the product. Each washing cycle exposed the tested product to both chemical, and mechanical wear. Three different kinds of cleansing products that are commonly used in car/marine cleaning applications were used in the test as chemical wear: a solvent-based degreaser, an alkaline degreaser and an anionic shampoo, were used as chemical wear. The mechanical wear from the wash sponge was simulated using BYK-Gardner Abrasion tester with a wash sponge as an abrasive material. The products were applied on the panels in accordance with each manufacturer’s instructions. The cleansing products used in the test were well-known products from major professional and retail brands on the market.

Car painted steel test panels and gelcoated fiberglass test panels without any applied product were in parallel used as reference panels.

Car painted steel test panels

Cold rolled steel (SS1142-32) was used to produce 55 pieces of panels with a thickness of 1.5 mm with the dimensions of 100×300 mm. The relative thickness was chosen in order to archive rigid test panels. The pieces were cleaned with 2-propanol (IPA) on both sides in order to remove any oily residues from previous handling. All pieces were painted on one side in an accredited car paint shop in accordance with industrial standards using Glasurit car paint with colour code VWLP3G Flashrot. These test panels were made to represent a modern car paint.

All car painted steel test panels were then prepared with an orbital polisher with 3M 80346 polishing compound with the aim to make the surface as even and smooth as possible. Thereafter the panels were degreased with both a solvent-based degreaser and an emulsion degreaser rinsed with water and finally washed with an anionic shampoo in order to remove the 3M polishing compound. The panels were then sprayed with IPA and dried with compressed air in order to remove any contaminants from the rinsing water. The test panels were carefully wrapped in bubble wrap, packed in boxes and stored until the actual test started.

Gelcoat test panels

Gelcoat test panels were prepared in the same dimensions as the car painted steel test panels. The panels were made in a plastic mould with approximate dimensions of 1000×900 mm. A mould release wax was applied to the mould before applying the gelcoat. The gelcoat used was Reichhold NORPOL SVG Gelcoat in colour code RAL3020. When the gelcoat was hardened a composite prepared from a powder bound fiberglass mat with a density of 450 g per  was bound in a matrix of Polylite 440-M850. The composite was applied in three layers in order to achieve rigid test panels, i.e. 100×300 mm. These test panels were made to represent a fiberglass boat’s outer gelcoat layer.

All gelcoat test panels were then prepared with an orbital polisher with 3M 80346 polishing compound in aim to make the surface as even and smooth as possible. After preparation, the panels were degreased with both solvent-based degreaser and an emulsion degreaser. Thereafter rinsed with water and then washed with an anionic shampoo in order to remove the 3M polishing compound. The panels were then sprayed with IPA and dried with compressed air in order to remove any contaminants from the rinsing water. The test panels were carefully wrapped in bubble wrap, packed in boxes and stored until the actual test started.

A washing cycle was defined in the following way:

1. A solvent-based degreaser was applied to the surface for five minutes. After five minutes the surface was thoroughly rinsed with deionized water.
2. An alkaline degreaser was applied to the surface for five minutes. After five minutes the surface was thoroughly rinsed with deionized water.
3. 20 cycles (1 cycle consists of 1 back and forth movement) of abrasion performed in a BYK-Gardner Abrasion tester, model A standard auto aftermarket wash sponge was used as abrasive material during abrasion. The sponge was continuously soaked with the car shampoo by a pump in order to prevent the surface from becoming dry during the abrasion.

12 of the 15 products have a durability between 1.2-2.6 washing cycles, which is well below the average of 4.1 washing cycles for the products tested on car painted steel test panels. 2 products were tested on gelcoated fiberglass test panels. The results varies greatly between these 2 products with TC Nano having a durability of approximately 1.5 washing cycles and Mr CAP FormulaU™ Marine Gelcoat Protection showing a durability at least 14 washing cycles. At least because the test was terminated after 14 washing cycles and the product was still active on the surface after 14 washing cycles.

The highest measured CA-value was achieved by the traditional hardwax product Simoniz Original Wax. However, the durability was well below average.

From the summary diagram 3 products stand out in the test in terms of durability. These are Mr CAP FormulaU™ Car Paint Protection, Mr CAP FormulaU™ Marine Gelcoat Protection and PPS Paint Sealant. However, the result varies between these three as well. PPS has durability of nearly 9 washing cycles and Mr CAP FormulaU™ Car Paint Protection and Mr CAP FormulaU™ Marine Gelcoat Protection have a durability of at least 14 washing cycles. The test was terminated after 14 washing cycles, and those two products were still active on the surface after 14 washing cycles.

SP Technical Research Institute of Sweden

SP Chemistry, Materials and Surfaces – Material and Surface Technology